wine-bugs September 2023

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
2319 discussions

[Bug 39859] New: WineHQ packages for wine-gecko and wine-mono
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39859 Bug ID: 39859 Summary: WineHQ packages for wine-gecko and wine-mono Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dimesio(a)earthlink.net CC: michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- Most users of the distros we now package for are accustomed to installing wine-gecko and wine-mono from packages. We should provide them. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 16

[Bug 53656] New: cannot install an update because of Conflicting Values set for option
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53656 Bug ID: 53656 Summary: cannot install an update because of Conflicting Values set for option Product: Wine Version: 7.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: thereal7kqx(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 73058 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73058 the error I am using LMDE 5, based on Debian, and this (bug?) is dragging me down ive tried everything i can to remove this stuff, but the delete button is just shaded black, or it spats out bullshit that it cant be removed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 54181] New: nothing provides wine-devel64 = 1:8.0.rc1-1.1 needed by winehq-devel-1:8.0.rc1-1.x86_64
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54181 Bug ID: 54181 Summary: nothing provides wine-devel64 = 1:8.0.rc1-1.1 needed by winehq-devel-1:8.0.rc1-1.x86_64 Product: Wine Version: 7.18 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: thegamemaster(a)hotmail.com Distribution: --- In Fedora 37 KDE Spin on Toshiba Satellite L655. Upon sudo dnf update -y error returned "Problem: cannot instal the best update candidate for package winehq-devel-1:7.22-1.1.x86_66 - nothing provides wine-devel64 = 1:8.0.rc1-1.1 needed by winehq-devel-1:8.0.rc1-1.1.x86_64 wine will not update. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 54835] New: Installation failure in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 Bug ID: 54835 Summary: Installation failure in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: saurabh.ghosh(a)nichi.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74337 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74337 Screenshot of the issue I have been trying to install wine in my Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. I have followed all the steps mentioned in (https://wiki.winehq.org/Ubuntu). However, there is a critical conflict in ubuntu. It requires "libgd3:i386", which when installed creates conflict with "libgd3" and removes packages "colord, gnome-control-center, libgd3, libgphoto2-6 & libsane1 sane-utils". Removal of "gnome-control-center" is unacceptable as it handles the ubuntu settings app, also I need "colord" because I use night light settings. I can't seem to find any workaround! Please help. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 55256] New: apt update does not find any upgrade for 8.0~repack-4 installed version
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55256 Bug ID: 55256 Summary: apt update does not find any upgrade for 8.0~repack-4 installed version Product: Wine-staging Version: 8.12 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: b1779506(a)trbvn.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Os is ubuntu 23.04 Lunar Lobster, with the repo added: sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 sudo mkdir -pm755 /etc/apt/keyrings sudo wget -O /etc/apt/keyrings/winehq-archive.key https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key sudo wget -NP /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/dists/lunar/winehq-lunar.sources Installed versions of wine: fonts-wine/lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 all [installed] libkwineffects14/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 4:5.27.4-0ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] libwine-development/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 7.20~repack-1 amd64 [installed,automatic] libwine/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 amd64 [installed,automatic] libwine/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 i386 [installed,automatic] wine32/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 i386 [installed] wine64/lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 amd64 [installed] wine/lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,now 8.0~repack-4 all [installed,automatic] winetricks/lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,lunar,now 20220411-1 all [installed] Running apt update; apt updgrade does not install the desired 8.12. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 23

[Bug 55253] New: Error during update
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55253 Bug ID: 55253 Summary: Error during update Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: bahman.davoudi.dehaghi(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74860 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74860 It seems that release file is not reachable I am using Ubuntu 20.04 with a Kubuntu desktop. My computer is: Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04 KDE Plasma Version: 5.18.8 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.68.0 Qt Version: 5.12.8 Kernel Version: 5.15.0-76-generic OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i3 CPU M 330 @ 2.13GHz Memory: 3.7 GiB of RAM I am recently receiving an error during the update saying that the release file is not available. It seems that the release file is available here: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/dists/focal/. I don't know what to do. Thanks for your time and help in advance. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 47558] New: Ubuntu package for 4.12.1 cannot open project in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Bug ID: 47558 Summary: Ubuntu package for 4.12.1 cannot open project in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net, michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 64946 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64946 output of Wine When I run Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 with Wine 4.12.1 in Ubuntu, I get the following dialog when trying to open a project: Sorry, a serious error has occurred that requires Adobe Premiere Pro to shut down. We will attempt to save your current project. Rebuilding Wine myself from Git, currently the latest commit matches 4.12.1, does not show this problem. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 26

[Bug 50692] New: Office 2019 Professional Plus doesn't install
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Feb '24

11 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50692 Bug ID: 50692 Summary: Office 2019 Professional Plus doesn't install Product: Wine Version: 6.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: atillolann-1815(a)yopmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 69422 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69422 Terminal Log Tried intalling Office 2019 ProPlus Retail, after the loading screen the installer crashes. Using Wine 6.2-developer Arch: x86_64 Distro: Linux Mint 19.0 Cinnamon 64 bit -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 32

[Bug 14010] New: RivaTuner 2.09 not work ,no overclocking or sensor ability
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '24

10 Feb '24

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14010 Summary: RivaTuner 2.09 not work ,no overclocking or sensor ability Product: Wine Version: 1.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dj--alex(a)ya.ru RivaTuner 2.09 not work ,no overclocking or sensor ability My videocard is very loud without this program!! I and not only i, want to overclocking without BIOS VRAM rewrite. Program can be downloaded free from http://www.radeon.ru/ (Main menu left - newest version) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 51360] New: vkGetDeviceProcAddr invalid behavior for functions from extensions unsupported by host Vulkan instance
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Feb '24

09 Feb '24

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51360 Bug ID: 51360 Summary: vkGetDeviceProcAddr invalid behavior for functions from extensions unsupported by host Vulkan instance Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winevulkan Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: loothelion(a)nvidia.com Distribution: --- I believe the below may also be true for vkGetInstanceProcAddr, but I haven't confirmed this locally. The Vulkan 1.2.182 specification states the following about the behavior of vkGetDeviceProcAddr: > The table below defines the various use cases for vkGetDeviceProcAddr and > expected return value for each case. > > The returned function pointer is of type PFN_vkVoidFunction, and must be cast to > the type of the command being queried before use. The function pointer must only > be called with a dispatchable object (the first parameter) that is device or a > child of device. > > Table 2. vkGetDeviceProcAddr behavior > > device | pName | return value > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NULL | *[1] | undefined > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > invalid device | *[1] | undefined > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > device | NULL | undefined > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > device | core device-level Vulkan command [2] | fp[3] > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > device | enabled extension device-level commands [2] | fp[3] > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > any other case, not covered above | NULL > > [1] - "*" means any representable value for the parameter (including valid > values, invalid values, and NULL). > > [2] - In this function, device-level excludes all physical-device-level > commands. > > [3] - The returned function pointer must only be called with a dispatchable > object (the first parameter) that is device or a child of device e.g. > VkDevice, VkQueue, or VkCommandBuffer. Winevulkan's behavior differs from this slightly. Note the fifth row of the table uses the language "enabled extension device-level commands", this means that if a command is queried via vkGetDeviceProcAddr and isn't part of core, the extension which introduces it must be enabled for the given VkDevice object in order for vkGetDeviceProcAddr to return a valid function pointer, and otherwise it should return NULL. In order to properly conform to the Vulkan specification Winevulkan should only expose device-level commands whose extensions have been enabled. Note that applications should not be querying for Vulkan commands via vkGetDeviceProcAddr if they know the extension is not supported by the underlying implementation. However in the case of an application which does rely on this bad behavior, Winevulkan will return a function pointer to one of its thunks and then proceed to deference a null function pointer when it tries to call into the underlying host Vulkan implementation. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs September 2023