http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:24 -------
Bug comments restored from Gmane.org:
------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-08-30 19:43 -------
I am trying to get the client program for ParadisePoker.com running on wine. It
was working until a few days ago when they distributed an updated version of the
client. winedbg reports unimplemented function: kernel32.dll.Heap32ListFirst
when I try to run it now. Looking at the spec file, I see that none of the
Heap32* functions are implemented. I would like to help any way I can, but
after reviewing the MSDN descriptions of the functions and some of the code
involved in related functions such as CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, I think it may
be a bit beyond what I currently know. Any tips are appreciated, and I would be
happy to provide the debug info I've collected so far.
Per Nystrom
------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-09-03 00:53 -------
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-09-04 23:55 -------
Here's abbreviated --debugmsg +relay output, though I'm not really sure if I've
gotten the part where it starts to barf. I've done some more reading, and it
sounds to me like CreateToolhelp32Snapshot and friends are typically used for
Windows debugging (is this correct?) so maybe the real culprit is further up the
chain. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
08c58100:Call user32.GetCursorInfo(422a6590) ret=40c743a4
08c58100:Call x11drv.GetCursorPos(422a659c) ret=408279ad
08c58100:Ret x11drv.GetCursorPos() retval=00000134 ret=408279ad
08c58100:Ret user32.GetCursorInfo() retval=00000001 ret=40c743a4
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473
08c58100:Call user32.GetQueueStatus(000000bf) ret=40c743d0
08c58100:Ret user32.GetQueueStatus() retval=00000000 ret=40c743d0
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473
08c58100:Call kernel32.FreeLibrary(407e0000) ret=40c743f1
08c58100:Ret kernel32.FreeLibrary() retval=00000001 ret=40c743f1
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7f0
"CreateToolhelp32Snapshot") ret=40c74401
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40677000 ret=40c74401
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7e4 "Heap32First")
ret=40c7440b
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=4061771c ret=40c7440b
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7d8 "Heap32Next")
ret=40c74417
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617770 ret=40c74417
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7c8 "Heap32ListFirst")
ret=40c74423
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617738 ret=40c74423
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7b8 "Heap32ListNext")
ret=40c7442d
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617754 ret=40c7442d
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7a8 "Process32First")
ret=40c74439
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d10 ret=40c74439
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe798 "Process32Next")
ret=40c74445
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d20 ret=40c74445
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe788 "Thread32First")
ret=40c74451
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797c0 ret=40c74451
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe778 "Thread32Next")
ret=40c7445d
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797d0 ret=40c7445d
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe768 "Module32First")
ret=40c74469
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ad0 ret=40c74469
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe758 "Module32Next")
ret=40c74475
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ae0 ret=40c74475
08c58100:Call kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot(0000000f,00000000)
ret=40c744f7
08c58100:Ret kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot() retval=000000c4 ret=40c744f7
08c58100:Call kernel32.GetLastError() ret=00443683
08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=00443683
08c58100:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000009) ret=00443691
08c58100:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=41bd01e0 ret=00443691
08c58100:Call kernel32.SetLastError(00000002) ret=004436dd
08c58100:Ret kernel32.SetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=004436dd
08c58100:Call kernel32.UnhandledExceptionFilter(422a60a0) ret=00444eb6
08c58100:Call kernel32.IsBadCodePtr(7800b322) ret=00449078
08c58100:Ret kernel32.IsBadCodePtr() retval=00000000 ret=00449078
wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:22 -------
Bug comments restored from Gmane.org:
I can see the following error while trying to execute Pervasive's iscout program
to test Database interactivity over the network:
fixme:win32:CallNamedPipeA "\\\\BTI-RICHARD\\PIPE\\BMKDE\\FUNCTION.PIP"
0x405d5e98 82 0x405d5fbc 82 0x405d6010 10000
fixme:netbios:Netbios NCBADDNAME
fixme:netbios:Netbios NCBADDNAME
Can I Fix this?. I've seen an error like this one with PeekNamedPipe
Can you help me?.
Thanks in advance
------------------
Pablo Abrile
Informatica
UNCPBA
http://www.unicen.edu.ar
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 -------
Bug comments restored from Gmane.org:
Attempting to install Eudora Pro 4.2, I got the following error popup:
Eudora Pro Email 4.2 Setup
An error occurred during the move data process: -160
Component: Eudora\Shared DLLs
File Group: Shared DLLs
File: Wininet.dll
If you need more info, let me know what you want and how to generate it...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 -------
Bug comments restored from Gmane.org:
I first noted this in ACCPAC but have attached a minimal case that demonstrates
the same problem. The issue requires a native comctl32.dll (specifically I
used a Windows NT one).
If an image list is created and no background is set (or, in the ACCPAC case if
the background is not white) then random pixels appear in the background of the
icon.
I believe that this has to be something to do with the gdi and the bitmap code.
------- Additional Comments From billmedland <at> look.ca 2002-08-29 15:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=281)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=281&action=view)
source for program demonstarting the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:20 -------
Bug comments restored from Gmane.org:
As in title ....
it was for string "-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859"
and to mach "-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n"
maches for [] paterns are not implemented.
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42
-------
please be more specific in your bug report
------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:32
-------
Created an attachment (id=313)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=313&action=view)
Wine log (shortened)
------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:34
-------
I see the same message while installing game Incubation (it worked perfectly
with wine version 20020605, it doesn't work now with 20021007)
I sent wine log as attachment, I hope it will help
Użytkownik wine-bugs <at> winehq.com napisał:
>http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42
-------
>please be more specific in your bug report
>
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>
As i wrote function call looks like
sscanf("-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n","-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859",
... rest of the line)
runing program which contains this calls causes message
"fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_sscanf unhandled:
%["
I've looked in code and for me it looks like patterns [abc...z], [a-z], [^xgd] etc,etc are not
handled at all.
Jacek Bator
------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-02 02:37 -------
I have implemented the [ format specifier in the scanf functions, I havn't been
able to look at the log because when I click on the link then it asks me it I
wan't to save the showattachment.cgi. I suppose this bug should be closed, anyone?
nog.
------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-13 11:44 -------
I suppose I should have been more clear: Someone should close this bug.
------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:48
-------
Yep, closed.
------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:49
-------
Now close it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-06 05:00 -------
Looking again after my morning cup of tea, I think the problem is that
timeGetTime always returns the same value:
0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec
0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec
etc
I think the return figure should be ticking up, at least a little bit.
Another suspect is this line:
0009:Call kernel32.Sleep(00000000) ret=00401527
0009:Ret kernel32.Sleep() retval=00000102 ret=00401527
A value of zero here means relinquish for the remainder of the timeslice. Maybe
this is how it measures clockspeed, ms between timeslices?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 04:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=293)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=293&action=view)
gzip'd text file of everything before "mhz" excluding CriticalSection calls
Hopefully this attaches properly...
I'm not sure exactly what may/may not be of interest so here is everything
before and including the first "mhz" line, with Enter/LeaveCriticalSection
calls filtered out.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533
------- Additional Comments From ed(a)centralmanclc.com 2003-23-06 04:47 -------
I can provide the locked, 30-day trial installation files. They are however
about 40Mb. There are all sorts of data files associated with the program.
If this is too large I could try and work out which files, as well as the
binary, are required to reproduce the problem
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-06 04:43 -------
IIRC timeGetTime is known to report values differently to the Microsoft version.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 04:41 -------
Those timeGetTime() calls might actually be the MHz measuring calls I suspect.
Can you check through the trace if anything interesting is before that
sequence?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
khalek(a)scummvm.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #291 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 04:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=292)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=292&action=view)
500 lines of output with CriticalSection calls filtered out
should I do another with winmm.timeGetTime and
kernel32.Release/RestoreThunkLock filtered out?
they seem to be repeated quite a bit with the same numbers....
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 04:05 -------
hmm, either the winmmGetTime calls ... the end was correct, but can you quote 500 lines before it and filter out the RtlEnterCriticalSection and RtlLeaveCriticalSection calls please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 01:27 -------
can you run the game with --debugmsg +relay appended to the commandline.
it will create a large debuglog, so redirect to a file.
look for "mhz" (case insensitive) in the file. there are probably be
RegOpenKey / RegCreateKey in the vicinity.
Please attach the parts of the trace with the Mhz and the like 100-200 lines
before.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 01:09 -------
The win32 binaries are part of a seperate product sold in the uk/europe as the
"lucasarts entertainment pack" and to my knowledge aren't available as a
seperate download.
Aaron Giles of mame/lucasarts fame is the person who updated the games to have
directx bits. Some more information can be found on his website ie
http://www.aarongiles.com/scumm/index.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 00:58 -------
Are the Win32 binaries available for download? I have FT, but only the DOS version ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538
Summary: error (in SetBitmapBits?) - unhandled exception, when
running Shareaza
Product: Wine
Version: 20030508
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.aspire-is.com/pub/shareaza_bug.txt
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-gdi
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: lane-winehq(a)aspire-is.com
for the full output of "wine --debugmsg +all shareaza.exe" go to the url above or here:
http://www.aspire-is.com/pub/shareaza_bug.txt
The tail of that file is:
trace:string:lstrcpynA (0x406a262c, "USER", 260)
trace:bitmap:CreateBitmap 32x32, 65536 colors returning 0x1a18
trace:bitmap:SetBitmapBits (0x1a18, 2048, 0x403ee984) 32x32 65536 colors fetched height: 32
wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger...
trace:string:lstrcpynW (0x4058d8f0, L"C:\\Program Files\\Shareaza\\Shareaza.exe", 260)
trace:string:lstrcpynA (0x4058db5c, "/home/lane/.wine/fake_windows", 1024)
trace:string:lstrcpynA (0x4058db5c, "/home/lane/.wine/fake_windows", 1024)
trace:string:lstrcpynA (0x4058db7a, "Program Files/Shareaza", 994)
trace:string:lstrcpynW (0x4058df62, L"PROG~FBU\\SHAREAZA", 1021)
lane@multios Shareaza $
This is when running shareaza
http://www.kiwiuk.net/shareaza/Shareaza1890.exe
wine 20030508
on a gentoo (www.gentoo.org) linux box:
Linux multios 2.4.20-xfs-r3 #2 SMP Wed Jun 18 20:57:53 CDT 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
If you need me to run some commands in the wine debugger -- well, it never actually brings up the debugger, so I don't know how to help. but just tell me what to do and I'll do it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 20:21 -------
Received in email from Jeff May:
"Yes, it works perfectly. Thanks!"
So I am closing this bug, good job guys..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 20:06 -------
AND closing
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 20:05 -------
and Closing
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |514
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 20:02 -------
making depend on 514 per andy's comments
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 19:56 -------
and closing..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396
Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2003-22-06 19:56 -------
resolving fixed..
if the issue still exists, feel free to reopen the bug or file a new one.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.