http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
------- Additional Comments From jake(a)bugzilla.org 2003-17-05 22:13 -------
What's really strange (to me, at least) is that I installed RH 9 on a friends
machine, did all the errata updates, then grabed wine from CVS and
compiled/installed it and it worked fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
------- Additional Comments From rebus(a)seznam.cz 2003-17-05 17:06 -------
Hello I have tested this on fresh installed machine with RedHat linux 9 with
original kernel and glib from distribution and it behaves the same.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958
------- Additional Comments From roz(a)one.net 2003-17-05 14:32 -------
That's odd, I had some comments here before.
I was using Windows Media Player.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
jake(a)bugzilla.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jake(a)bugzilla.org
------- Additional Comments From jake(a)bugzilla.org 2003-17-05 11:13 -------
I just tried to install from CVS and am seeing the same error... I can't even
get the registry to import (correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the "Could not
stat" errors can be ignored):
[jake@waldo regedit]$ ./regedit ../../winedefault.reg
Could not stat /mnt/fd0 (No such file or directory), ignoring drive A:
Could not stat /cdrom (No such file or directory), ignoring drive D:
wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger...
err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr
0x4027b378
I did not use the --with-nptl option.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448
------- Additional Comments From fenix(a)club-internet.fr 2003-17-05 07:09 -------
Currently i have UT2003 demo working on my tree (i'm waiting for alexandre commits).
It need a need code for d3d8 32 bit support and my last dinput patch.
Install works well.
Menu works well.
The game is playable but we have some colors problems (i'm investigating it)
For the videos (who don't use the 3d engine) we need a new quartz implementation
waiting for lionel to begin ;)
PS: what it's you problem with registry access ??
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
Summary: Wine gets compiled under RedHat Linux 9, but it fails to
run (unhandled exception)
Product: Wine
Version: 20030508
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: rebus(a)seznam.cz
Hello,
I have got problems running wine under RedHat Linux 9.
I compile it with --with-nptl option. It compiles wel, but when I try to run it
by running "wine --debugmsg +all notepad" it always fails with errorn:
wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger...
err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr
0x40279df4
The very same error I get by running winecfg, winepath, winehelp.
Tested on three different machines
Hardware: Athlon 1200, Athlon 2000, Pentium 166MHz
System: RedHat Linux 9 (fresh install, no upgrade from 8.0.94)
updated kernel -2.4.20-9
updated glibc -2.3.2-27.9
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=777
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr 2003-16-05 18:49 -------
... and closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=777
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr 2003-16-05 18:48 -------
It works now... Im setting the bug as fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr 2003-16-05 18:44 -------
closing
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr 2003-16-05 18:44 -------
closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
Summary: test bug without description
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: test
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-16-05 17:08 -------
There is a wine-d3d mailinglist at: wine-d3d(a)bbrox.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033
------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-16-05 16:55 -------
This has been fixed. WFM with Wine 20030508.
This bug can be closed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127
------- Additional Comments From R.J.Shearman(a)warwick.ac.uk 2003-05-16 08:07 -------
I've discovered the reason it corrupts the heap is because it destroys the
dialog in WM_INITDIALOG (patch on the way) but the reason it does this is still
unknown to me.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406
marc_lavergne(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
------- Additional Comments From marc_lavergne(a)yahoo.com 2003-05-15 22:56 -------
Since there's a workaround, moving this to a normal severity. I haven't had a
chance to revisit it but I will get the heap alloc trace done shortly.
Workaround: modify LOCAL_GetBlock in memory/local.c to prevent arena==0 exits.
Not a permanent fix since it introduces an unhandled condition and is "the wrong
way to do things" anyhow.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462
------- Additional Comments From reif(a)earthlink.net 2003-05-15 19:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=482)
example MFC program: slider.exe
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462
Summary: vertical trackbar/slider doesn't render properly
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-gui
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: reif(a)earthlink.net
Vertical trackbar/slider doesn't render properly.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350
juan(a)virtual-orbis.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|20030318 |20030508
------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-05-15 15:54 -------
5/11/2003 12:12:31 +0300
In a mail from: Jukka Heinonen <jhei(a)iki.fi>
I have a feeling that bug #1352 is what prevents newer TakeCommand/32
versions from running. I have no idea what causes this bug.
I didn't find older TakeCommand/32 versions mentioned in bug #1350
but TakeCommand/16 seems to show similar behaviour. It looks like
TC/16 calls DOS int21 routines for input/output and expects
that those interrupts somehow interact with TC/16 window. Input
related problem is quite easy to fix but I don't know how
TC/16 expects its window to be updated via int21.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351
------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-05-15 15:47 -------
under 20030508 version 4DOS now loads, but hangs without executing any
command...
(lots of int2f & int21 messages than ever)
[cad@pc-2 cad]$ wine 4dos.com
Warning: unprotecting the first 64KB of memory to allow real-mode calls.
NULL pointer accesses will no longer be caught.
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX d44d, BX 00bc, CX 0008, DX 0080, SI 1059, DI 0605, DS 00c7, ES f000
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX 4a33, BX 3dc0, CX 0010, DX 7a85, SI 0101, DI 1033, DS 00c7, ES 00c7
4DOS XMS swapping initialized (241K)
4DOS running under Windows 95
err:int:do_int2f_16 int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX 168f, BX 6d70, CX 0004, DX 0000, SI 0082, DI a999, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
4DOS 7.50 (Win95) DOS 7.00
Copyright 1988-2003 Rex Conn & JP Software Inc. All Rights Reserved
fixme:int21:INT_Int21Handler Unimplemented long file name function:
err:int21:INT_Int21Handler int21: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int21: AX 71a7, BX 0000, CX 0000, DX 01c2, SI 9ce6, DI 9cbe, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
4DOS, S/N 999001. This trial version of 4DOS may be used for up to 21 days
before purchase.
>> 21 days remain in your evaluation period. To learn about how the
>> evaluation period works see TRIAL.TXT.
To order call 410-810-8819, visit our web site at http://jpsoft.com/,
or see the order form in ORDERS.TXT.
fixme:int21:INT_Int21Handler Unimplemented long file name function:
err:int21:INT_Int21Handler int21: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int21: AX 71a7, BX 0000, CX 0000, DX 01c2, SI 9ce6, DI 9cbe, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
fixme:int21:INT_Int21Handler Unimplemented long file name function:
err:int21:INT_Int21Handler int21: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int21: AX 71a7, BX 0000, CX 0000, DX 01c3, SI a086, DI a05a, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
rem C:\ARCHIV~1\THEHAC~1\THD.EXE /NORES /NOMENSAJE
SET BLASTER=A220 I5 D1 T4
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX ae00, BX a64a, CX ff16, DX ffff, SI a638, DI 58d0, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
REM - BY WINDOWS SETUP - C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\MSCDEX /D:MVCD001 /M:10 /V /E
rem MODE CON CODEPAGE PREPARE=((850) C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\EGA.CPI)
rem MODE CON CODEPAGE SELECT=850
rem KEYB LA,,C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\KEYBOARD.SYS
SET
PATH=C:\windows;C:\windows\system;X:\;Y:\;C:\ARCHIV~1\ARCHIV~1\AUTODE~1;Y:\4DOS
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX ae00, BX a64a, CX ff50, DX ffff, SI a638, DI 58d0, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
SET
PATH=C:\ARCHIV~1\THEHAC~1\;C:\windows;C:\windows\system;X:\;Y:\;C:\ARCHIV~1\ARCHIV~1\AUTODE~1;Y:\4DOS;Y:\4DOS
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX ae00, BX a64a, CX ff6e, DX ffff, SI a638, DI 58d0, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
set comspec=Y:\4DOS\4dos.com
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX ae00, BX a64a, CX ff19, DX ffff, SI a638, DI 58d0, DS 94e4, ES 94e4
err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX d44e, BX 0000, CX 0029, DX 0000, SI 0082, DI a999, DS 94e4, ES 00c7
y:\>err:int:DOSVM_Int2fHandler int2f: unknown/not implemented parameters:
int2f: AX d44e, BX 0001, CX 0042, DX 0000, SI 0082, DI a999, DS 94e4, ES 00c7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351
juan(a)virtual-orbis.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|20030318 |20030508
------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-05-15 14:44 -------
5/11/2003 12:12:31 +0300
From: Jukka Heinonen <jhei(a)iki.fi> (in an e-mail to Juan Melgarejo)
4DOS calls those DESQview routines that really must be emulated
in order to get 4DOS working. But I already figured out why 4DOS
thinks it is running under DESQview (set date routine is used for
installation checks!). I also fixed a bunch of other bugs and 4DOS
should now work using latest Wine CVS version. Perhaps you should
verify this and close bug #1351 (or update it because editing command
line and some 4DOS commands do not work).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457
prupe(a)myrealbox.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From prupe(a)myrealbox.com 2003-05-14 11:46 -------
Yep, that fixes it.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458
------- Additional Comments From gabriele.giorgetti(a)teamfab.it 2003-05-14 05:32 -------
This is from the configure script in Wine.
I can't figure out why this test returns 0
while it should return 1 here.
All I do is make it return 1 anyway, but this, of course
,is not a valid patch for other kernels :-)
10629 #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
10630 #include <stdio.h>
10631 #include <unistd.h>
10632 #include <fcntl.h>
10633 #include <sys/mman.h>
10634 #include <errno.h>
10635
10636 int main(int argc,char **argv) {
10637 int fd = open("conftest.map",O_CREAT|O_RDWR,0600);
10638 if (fd == -1) exit(1);
10639
10640 unlink("conftest.map");
10641
10642 write(fd,"test",4);
10643
10644 if ((-1 ==
mmap(0,4,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_SHARED,fd,0)) &&
10645 (errno == EINVAL)
10646 ) {
10647 exit(1);
10648 }
10649 close(fd);
10650 fprintf(stderr,"success!\n");
10651 exit(0);
10652 }
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.