http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr
Platform| |All
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681
spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr
Platform| |All
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-03 09:34 -------
Silly question perhaps, but did you run ./configure before you did a make depend
&& make?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851
Summary: Failed run configure script under RH7.2
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-tools
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: jingle(a)telekbird.com.cn
Hi,
the configure script in both Wine20020605 and CVS snapshot can't run
successfully under RH7.2. while the configure script in Wine20020310 is ok.
The script exited while getting the sizeof long long.
the config.log told me that:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
configure:12140: $? = 0
configure:12143: test -s conftest.o
configure:12146: $? = 0
configure:12156: result: yes
configure:12159: checking size of long long
configure:12411: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
conftest.c -lm >&5
/tmp/ccm39JWL.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccm39JWL.s:378: Warning: Unrecognized .section attribute: want a,w,x
/tmp/ccm39JWL.s:378: Warning: Unrecognized .section attribute: want a,w,x
/tmp/ccm39JWL.s:378: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored character is
`,'.
configure:12414: $? = 1
configure: program exited with status 1
configure: failed program was:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
some autoxxxx packages in my linux box:
automake-1.4p5-2
autoconvert-xchat-0.3.7-4
autoconvert-0.3.7-4
autorun-2.7-1
autoconf253-2.53-3
autofs-3.1.7-21
automake15-1.5-2
Thanx!
Jingle.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823
------- Additional Comments From danielsabo(a)myrealbox.com 2002-07-02 21:10 -------
Created an attachment (id=198)
The ppd file returned by cups. Note: I retrieved it with my own program rather than recompile wine.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823
------- Additional Comments From danielsabo(a)myrealbox.com 2002-07-02 21:08 -------
I have the same issue. Running notepad (no debugmsg) outputs this:
err:psdrv:PSDRV_PPDGetNextTuple Error in line '*CloseUI *stpBrightness
'?
To use WINEPS you need to install some AFM files.
fixme:winspool:AddPrinterW DocumentPropertiesW on printer 'L"LaserJet6L"' fails
To use WINEPS you need to install some AFM files.
err:winspool:AddPrinterW DocumentPropertiesW on printer 'L"LaserJet6L"' failed!
err:winspool:CUPS_LoadPrinters printer 'LaserJet6L' not added by AddPrinterA
(error 1797)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-07-02 16:09 -------
Err, AFAIK GLE *never* gets reset in case of successful function execution...
That's just the very nature of GLE.
GetProcAddress() is a well-known example of this.
Despite returning a valid function pointer, a GLE() after GetProcAddress()
still yields something like ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND or whatever a previous error was...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-02 14:57 -------
According to the log the function winspool.drv.EnumPrintersA() returns success
(not zero value), but the subsequent call to GetLastError returns FILE_NOT_FOUND
error.
Needs further research.
Traxtopel, could you attach packed full log to the bug report?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849
apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-binary |wine-files
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-02 14:37 -------
The direct cause of the problem is a failure of GetFileAttributesA call for file
"E:\\lwpdumfl.xxx". Later call of GetLastError returns ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
error description. The file name looks like a name for temporary file.
Traxtopel, does the mentioned file exist at the moment the program crashes?
Check if E drive is mapped correctly and has write privileges.
I'd like to see if there were any problems when the file was created.
Could you attach to the bug report packed full log?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848
apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-02 13:32 -------
Closing per reporter's comments.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803
------- Additional Comments From firewire(a)e-tahan.com 2002-07-02 03:33 -------
I tried both patches but still having the warning that my libc is not reentrant.
also i tried to switch the order to check freebsd before linux and didn't
correct the problem.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848
whf(a)alum.mit.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From whf(a)alum.mit.edu 2002-07-01 23:46 -------
My mistake, antiquye library lying around from previous compile.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-01 23:45 -------
Did you use ./tools/wineinstall to compile wine?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848
Summary: Wine 20020605 compiles ok linux 2.4.1, but dies loading
library libwine.so
Product: Wine
Version: 20020605
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: test
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: whf(a)alum.mit.edu
Compiled 20020605 with Mandrake 8.1 and kernel 2.4.1, perl 5.6.1 no problems.
When installing registry, I get:
[whf@pasteur wine-20020605]$ /usr/local/bin/wine
/usr/local/bin/wine: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libwine.so: undefined symbol: stdscr
help appreciated.
thanks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-01 18:45 -------
You might be interested in this thread on wine devel. I think that this is the
cause of your problem and this probably will be fixed in the next snapshot which
I assume will be released in the next week or so.
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/07/0006.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-01 18:25 -------
I was thinking about the wrong patch... Doh. Patch submitted to CVS.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846
apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-01 15:29 -------
Closing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846
apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-01 15:29 -------
Did not finish. Submitted by accident.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846
Summary: File dialogs don't use default extention specification
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-misc
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: apa3a(a)yahoo.com
Wine file dialogs don't use member lpstrDefExt of the OPENFILENAME
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395
fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |845
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845
Summary: gcc Remote debugging
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-debug
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
The idea is to use gdb's remote debugging feature to use it and debug
Wine/Winelib applications.
There are two main reasons why gdb cannot be used to debug Wine applications
directly:
* threading (Wine does weird things with threading and gdb does not know about them)
* 16-bit support (gdb does not know about segmented 16-bit pointers for instance)
(note that despite these issues you can use gdb directly in some cases, but you
will not be able to fully take advantage of it)
The goal behind this would be to:
* hopefully reduce the amount of code we have to maintain (e.g. code to support
DWARF2)
* benefit from a mature multi-platform debugger
* take advantage of the graphical gdb front-ends
Relevant discussion threads:
* 2001/04/20 - Ove Kaaven - GDB remote debugging for wine
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2001/04/0123.html
* 2002/04/13 - Mike Wetherell - benefit from a mature debugger
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=6xUt8.14322%24sL6.2032145%40…
* 2002/05/22 - Tijs van Bakel - Improving debugging (gdb) support
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/05/0613.html
* 2002/05/23 - Eric Pouech - Re: Improving debugging (gdb) support
Eric experimented with gdb's remote debugging capabilities and posted an
informative thread.
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/05/0659.html
* See also this comparison matrix by Eric Pouech
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/wine_and_gdb.html
* 2002/06/05 - Michael Cardenas - Re: Improving debugging (gdb) support
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/06/0005.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-07-01 11:23 -------
I think it's good to send to wine-patches, and then, once it's in CVS, you can
close this bug.
(But it's not in CVS yet)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.