http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:20 -------
Is this still a bug in latest CVS? CryptoAPI has been implemented for a long
time now iirc, it sounds like a regression or bug, rather than unimplemented API.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:19 -------
I'm moving this to the wine-net section, as I'm pretty sure it's to do with the
networking code. Can you do a +wnet,+winsock trace please.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350
------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-03-30 15:17 -------
Created an attachment (id=438)
Take Command under win98 (normal behaviour, no TCMD console window)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:16 -------
Are you behind a proxy?
By explorer, I assume you mean Internet Explorer?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|wine-dos |wine-loader
everconfirmed|0 |1
Summary|command line path not |argv[0] should be translated
|translated to DOS format |into DOS syntax
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:15 -------
Confirming bug, changing summary
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
Summary|lstat /tmp/.wine-ray/server-|Redhat updates to glibc
|307-19f5ff/socket : No such |2.3.x, breaking wine
|file or directory |threading
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:11 -------
Updated summary to be more useful. There are apparently workarounds for this
problem.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350
------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-03-30 15:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=437)
Take command window after typing "dir". Output is shown in the Linux shell window while the main window show inverted "?" signs. To see the "?" signs is necessary to change default foreground & background colors in the app otherwise the text is displayed as "blank". Behind the Konsole & Take Command window is TCMD window that is filled with other Xwindow's content.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:07 -------
Wine supports winsock2 mostly anyway, so it shouldn't need to update. The real
question is, why does it think it needs to update?
Do you have a ws2_32.dll file in your fake windows/system directory?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:06 -------
Closing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:04 -------
OK, I'll close this bug. Probably there was a slight regression that's been
fixed. Thanks for reporting the issue! :)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.