wine-bugs

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
158856 discussions

[Bug 1161] - CrypoAPI Not Implemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:20 ------- Is this still a bug in latest CVS? CryptoAPI has been implemented for a long time now iirc, it sounds like a regression or bug, rather than unimplemented API. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1348] - RegisterHotKey and UnregisterHotKey are not implemented.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:19 ------- I'm moving this to the wine-net section, as I'm pretty sure it's to do with the networking code. Can you do a +wnet,+winsock trace please. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1350] - JP soft's Take command /32 ver 3.01A displays "?" characters instead of text in command window
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350 ------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-03-30 15:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=438) Take Command under win98 (normal behaviour, no TCMD console window) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1293] - Explorer 6.1SP1 cannot download files.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:16 ------- Are you behind a proxy? By explorer, I assume you mean Internet Explorer? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1330] - argv[0] should be translated into DOS syntax
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|wine-dos |wine-loader everconfirmed|0 |1 Summary|command line path not |argv[0] should be translated |translated to DOS format |into DOS syntax ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:15 ------- Confirming bug, changing summary DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1343] - Redhat updates to glibc 2.3.x, breaking wine threading
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW everconfirmed|0 |1 Summary|lstat /tmp/.wine-ray/server-|Redhat updates to glibc |307-19f5ff/socket : No such |2.3.x, breaking wine |file or directory |threading ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:11 ------- Updated summary to be more useful. There are apparently workarounds for this problem. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1350] - JP soft's Take command /32 ver 3.01A displays "?" characters instead of text in command window
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350 ------- Additional Comments From juan(a)virtual-orbis.com 2003-03-30 15:09 ------- Created an attachment (id=437) Take command window after typing "dir". Output is shown in the Linux shell window while the main window show inverted "?" signs. To see the "?" signs is necessary to change default foreground & background colors in the app otherwise the text is displayed as "blank". Behind the Konsole & Take Command window is TCMD window that is filled with other Xwindow's content. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1335] - Game Drakan wants to update to Winsock2 which does not function
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:07 ------- Wine supports winsock2 mostly anyway, so it shouldn't need to update. The real question is, why does it think it needs to update? Do you have a ws2_32.dll file in your fake windows/system directory? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1334] - wine under redhat8.1 beta5 cannot use name resolution
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:06 ------- Closing DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1334] - wine under redhat8.1 beta5 cannot use name resolution
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-30 15:04 ------- OK, I'll close this bug. Probably there was a slight regression that's been fixed. Thanks for reporting the issue! :) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs