http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=160
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 23:21 -------
Reopening Bug based on comments by TuRuLo
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=160>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=159
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 22:06 -------
I can verify this is not a problem with winword.exe at this time.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=159>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=153
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:57 -------
I think it is safe to verify this one.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=153>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=148
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:51 -------
Marking as verified. This was a problem at one time but has been resoled for
quite a while.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=148>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=145
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:49 -------
Closing this bug report.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=145>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=132
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:34 -------
This was fixed long ago. Verifying.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=132>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:28 -------
I had a little difficulty getting Acrobat Reader 4.0 but I can verify this is
bug is fixed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 16:48 -------
OK, I sent away for the cd and will do the testing when it gets here. They say
about 2 weeks or less.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900
------- Additional Comments From hogger2(a)mushworld.dnsart.com 2002-07-22 15:34 -------
I've got a 233 with 64 megs of ram. THe CPU is ok for compiling in the
background. THe memory is a big problem, as is my only 16 GB of storage space
(of which, 800 MB is currently free. I do video recording with real time
compression on my computer, so I need all the CPU power I can get. Also, with
mozilla taking up 30 MB of memory, openoffice another 20MB, memory gets a bit
tight on this college workhorse. I've got summer school finals coming up right
now so I can't do much of my own testing. Upgrading from Debian potato to Debian
Woody is my next project. My main constraint though is the disk space.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 15:27 -------
Thankyou for the additional information. If you still see this with the latest
release of wine at least we have a couple of places to look at. I think that
this one is the most interesting, This is from Steve Varadi first post
> fixme:shdocvw:WBOC_GetControlInfo stub: LPCONTROLINFO = 0x4209df18
If I recall correctly shdocvw defaulted to "native, builtin" and only recently
(within the last couple of months) changed to the following.
"shdocvw" = "builtin, native"
This looks like a regression as well. In his next postSteve Varadi wrote the
following
> This way Quickenw is unusable. I never experiented this kind of problem with
> Quicken. It was working more than five years for me under wine.
> Could anyone give some hints what went wrong??
So I think that using a native shdocvw.dll might "solve" your problem but it
won't fix wine.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.