http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12783
--- Comment #4 from Albert Lee trisk+winehq@acm.jhu.edu 2008-04-25 11:28:57 --- (In reply to comment #3)
Probably the address range we computed for ntdll is incorrect, it wouldn't make sense to have an allocation in the middle of it. Can you check where ntdll.dll.so is actually mapped?
If I work around the allocations, I see: 0009: load_dll( handle=0, base=7ff90000, size=307200, dbg_offset=0, dbg_size=0, name=7fcc0160, filename=L"ntdll.dll" ) Adding a trace to load_builtin_callback also confirms this.