https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- Created attachment 73209 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73209 hack...
This fixes it, right?
It feels very ugly, because the noinline is necessary, but the alternatives I see are
(b) build the whole syscall_frame in assembly (not terrible, but why make more assembly?) or
(c) don't put the unix frame right under the syscall_frame, which means more indirection in the syscall handler (which means the syscall handler is potentially slower).