http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9942
--- Comment #20 from Jeremy White jwhite@codeweavers.com 2009-10-18 17:08:23 --- It's not as simple as it appears.
See the portion of the discussion here: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-October/079270.html
Apparently, some applications ship private versions of system dlls which function badly, and so we intentionally want to avoid them.
Alexandre is comfortable with accommodating this in specific cases, but he wants it quite narrow. He provides some further guidance in the thread referenced above. Dan also provides a bit of possibly useful guidance in this comments: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14980#c15