http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495
Ema ema.oriani@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ema.oriani@gmail.com
--- Comment #191 from Ema ema.oriani@gmail.com 2010-02-11 11:27:01 --- (In reply to comment #189)
(In reply to comment #188)
You're saying that Wine _only_ needs to/should _only_ support what's "common" and popular.
No.
Hi,
sorry to ask, but what are the main reasons why Wine devs don't want to include this patch in the main tree? I don't want to start any flame but here is a bit unclear between the huge amount of (very) detailed answers and is not easy to udnerstand the real reasons why. Is it because: *) patch code is of bad quality *) patch is buggy *) patch doesn't conform coding standard *) patch is incomplete *) pulse is present only in Linux and not on other architectures *) current wine devs/mantainers don't want to mantain this piece of code even if it's well written and works? Really, what are the reasons?
Thanks again,