http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14930
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression
--- Comment #16 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-02-15 15:52:06 --- (In reply to comment #15)
From my perspective, this bug is a regression with respect to Wine 1.0.0 and Wine 1.1.0. Does that not mean that it has to be fixed for Wine 1.2.0 ?
Doesn't 'have' to be, but we'd like it to be, sure. Ideally, should've been fixed as soon as it was reported (or not broken at all).
I know this isn't the case, but closing a bug that reports 'regression' by declaring it a duplicate of one that does not report 'regression' looks like cooking the books to make the statistics look good.
Not really the intention. No need to waste developers' time by giving them multiple bug reports to look at.
I've added the regression keyword nonetheless, to show Wine's not a US financial company.