http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29031
--- Comment #14 from Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu 2012-02-17 11:53:39 CST --- Created attachment 38929 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=38929 ntdll: Fix mapping sections for applications that map over the section headers.
(In reply to comment #13)
I should probably clarify, I feel like we might just be covering the issue up if we reverse the mapping order. It seems to me like Bernhard Loos's solution is more appropriate. I have no idea why it didn't get accepted, but I doubt my quicky solution will get in when Bernhard's didn't.
I think something like the attached would make a better candidate for inclusion, this way it won't matter how applications map over the section headers.