https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46870
--- Comment #25 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to imbert.jacquesolivier from comment #17)
Because my issue was reported as resolved ( duplicate of Bug 46961 ) but the bug 46961 has not the same issue as me and here... I will continue the posts here.
I don't understand your procedures to repair bugs ( or to consider a bug as resolved )... And thank you to modify the title and datas that doesn't correspond to the reality of my issue on my previous ticket.
I've replied to these concerns in bug 46961.
Why when we set WinXP prefix the game worked ? Why not with another prefix ? It is a mystery... So yeah according to Wine database and the status of the game, because of the current problem, League of Legends cannot have the Platinium/Gold status and can be considered that Wine code has a regression somewhere.
The regression is not in Wine. The regression is because League of Legends changed. This happened back in July 2018 or so (I don't remember exactly). It added an invasive anti-cheat engine. This engine was eventually sufficiently reverse-engineered by Andrew Wesie, who figured out how to successfully run it under Windows XP. However, he did not figure out how to successfully run it under Windows Vista or higher.
To finish that, according to a Wine-Staging author, the patches added on Wine-Staging solves the Leagues Of Legens anti-cheat engine issue :
https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-staging/commit/ ac1bb98de41a87e634037c5fc359858426709727
But we are here to say that's not the case...
To be clear, that patch does not claim that it fixes League of Legends in Vista+. It fixes *one* of the bugs affecting the anticheat engine in Vista+. But there are others, not all of which have been diagnosed yet.
So, what do you suggest to do before we have the invasion of the LOL Linux community because we have wrongs informations about the reality of the patches about anti-cheat engine. We have few days before to consider official the League of Legends as "Garbage".
Debug it? :D
Nobody has claimed that the patches existing work with Windows 7, so I'm not sure why you say there's "wrong information".