[Bug 20585] JPEG lack of support should not be critical, similar to HTML rendering

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20585

--- Comment #6 from Jerome Leclanche   2009-11-06 02:12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Closing.
> >
> > It's not compiled in on purpose, this bug was intended to discuss the
> > possibility to improve the handling of that support.
>
> Why?  It's a waste of time.  Seems pointless to add unnecessary lines of code
> for an intentionally broken setup.

Then why have the --without-jpeg configure option at all?