https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57306
--- Comment #14 from Rafał Mużyło galtgendo@o2.pl --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #13)
Thanks for the feedback, Rafał. What exactly would you do differently?
Gee, I don't know, pass the size of that array ?
Do we really need to have a sarcasm spar ?
Or did I perhaps miss a commit where you did explicitly state the assumptions the code makes, given that as the original algorithm was made for drawing, not storing, so doesn't have any inherent limits on how many points it would be able to handle ?