http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16674
Kai Blin kai.blin@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Regression SHA1|1bcbe8651acbdf21ceb1cf42bd5 | |3e57fa39bdef7 |
--- Comment #23 from Kai Blin kai.blin@gmail.com 2011-10-13 09:45:10 CDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
I finished the regression test and this is my result:
1bcbe8651acbdf21ceb1cf42bd53e57fa39bdef7 is first bad commit commit 1bcbe8651acbdf21ceb1cf42bd53e57fa39bdef7 Author: Kai Blin kai.blin@gmail.com Date: Thu Apr 24 13:45:10 2008 +0200
ws2_32: Work around the host name resolving to 127.x.x.x when using thatfor binding.
After having been pointed at this again, I'm pretty convinced that 36d63105991abef1612433e18207624f2f9e429e actually fixed the regression that was pointed out in your regression test, but possibly your bisect jumped over that.
Looking at the trace, I think this is again one of the cases where windows networking just works differently from Linux networking, as is the case for bug #7929. Please try the fix there, I'm afraid there's nothing much else we can do.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7929 ***