https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- As all of you know, the system automatically removes any maintainer who fails to process submissions within a week. Maintainers who are removed can reapply for reinstatement. Whether to accept that application is at the discretion of the admin processing it, and considering the maintainer's overall record in making that decision is perfectly valid.
Here is what Artem's record shows: 3DMark - most recent test report is for 2.10 Miranda - most recent test report is for 1.3.1 FAR Manager - most recent test report for 2.3 μTorrent - most recent test report is for 1.9.5 LibreOffice - most recent test report is for 1.5.29 Skype - most recent test report is for 2.1 WinSCP - most recent test report is for 3.5 Miranda NG - most recent test report is for 1.7.24 Irfanview - most recent test report is for 3.4 (and FYI, it was submitted by me)
As stated on https://wiki.winehq.org/AppDB_Maintainer_Guidelines, maintainers are expected to "Periodically submit your own test reports for the versions you maintain." We are pretty generous in interpreting that; for a supermaintainer, one test report for at least one version of the application per year should be sufficient. Artem clearly has not done anywhere near that, and IMO, rejecting his application for reinstatement was warranted.
Removing maintainers who are not doing their jobs does not burden the admins in any way.
Artem, you've gotten your apology from Rob; it's up to you whether you want to remain a maintainer. You can remove yourself from any entry you no longer wish to maintain by clicking the "Remove yourself as a maintainer" link on the relevant page(s).
This is not a bug.