http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18639
--- Comment #12 from Ben Klein shacklein@gmail.com 2009-06-01 20:51:11 --- (In reply to comment #11)
With other people, you'd be right to complain about long backtraces.
Anastasius should not be exempt from etiquette or policy because of his reputation. He used the objection at what is *in reality* an unnecessarily long post as a platform to boast his reputation. The objection is valid - we don't want long backtraces or logs in the bug *description*. The description should only be information relevant to describe the bug (in this case the "unimplemented function" line and possibly the .NET backtrace).
I'm not trying to be aggressive either, but Anastasius has chosen to take the objection as a personal attack.
(In reply to comment #7)
--- quote --- It'd be nice to know if just a stub is enough for the app to work or if it needs some implementation. --- quote ---
What part of:
--- quote --- A simple stub returning STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED is enough. --- quote ---
don't you understand?
The bit that didn't say "enough to make the application work, since it doesn't actually use this feature".