http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28491
--- Comment #9 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2012-01-05 06:53:27 CST --- (In reply to comment #8)
ec04f80cf606f07a630bfc515f004be9cc4679ff dates back to September, 18, whereas the regression is present as of 1.3.36. Is there any chance that ec04f80cf606f07a630bfc515f004be9cc4679ff envelops not all regressions caused by 5de020342cc039819b6fe11ee787d5a9a288f85a ?
Maybe, but I'd be somewhat surprised. Does it work with ec04f80cf606f07a630bfc515f004be9cc4679ff, or even just ec04f80cf606f07a630bfc515f004be9cc4679ff applied on top of 5de020342cc039819b6fe11ee787d5a9a288f85a?