https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53058
Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to Peter from comment #1)
Created attachment 72465 [details] sock.c patch
This is a patch which fixes the issue as far as we can tell and there *shouldn't* be any unintended side effects.
Hmm, I wonder if it's the right place to solve the problem, though. I wonder if we should never be setting DGRAM sockets to SOCK_CONNECTED state in the first place. There are only a few places where SOCK_CONNECTED is treated differently from SOCK_CONNECTIONLESS, but I dont think we have tests for whether any of those should apply to connectionless sockets.