https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de --- @Erich: I'd like to know your opinion. Your current patchset for junction points adds support for IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT - however, on Windows there are many more reparse tags. If we would return IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK the application would be happy, but we have no way to store this additional information in the unix symlink. Should we drop support for mount points, and instead always return it would be a symlink? Or do you have any idea how to implement it properly?