http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21387
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |dank@kegel.com Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #12 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2011-08-03 12:03:33 CDT --- It sounds like we need a conformance test which does a winsock recv() for 1 byte with MSG_PEEK in the flags field. Can you add one?
(For what it's worth, here are two possibly related pages:
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2001/06/poll.html reminds us that we have to test on multiple unixes before changing code that relates to poll, as they return different results from poll under the same conditions.
http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/2003-October/000336.html suggests that the Linux kernel translates POLLERR into "both readable and writable", and POLLHUP into "readable", in its select().)