http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
Hin-Tak Leung htl10@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |0.9.60
--- Comment #15 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-20 21:33:40 --- (In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Hmm, the problem is in 1.1.13, does it matter what version of wine it was reported for originally?
Yes it does, otherwise we would keep CVS/GIT tag.
I still don't understand why it cannot be "a version where the bug exists", instead of "a version when the problem was first noticed". This bug is not a regression bug so the latter is really IMHO unimportant.
In any case, as noted in the initial report, this bug was a follow-up on "cannot install", and the "cannot install" bug was committed and fixed for 0.9.60 on 2008-04-18, but I filed this on 2008-04-07, so I must have been using GIT at a time-frame between 0.9.59 and 0.9.60 to install, and then noticed it does not run. If it makes you happy, the version is 0.9.60, but to be really accurate, it was as I filed it, CVS/GIT about 10 days before 0.9.60.
Now, can you explain why does it matter to you between "a version where the bug exists" and "a version where the problem was first noticed"?