13 Feb
2010
13 Feb
'10
9:47 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495
--- Comment #208 from Rotbart van Dainig rotbart_van_dainig@lavabit.com 2010-02-13 03:47:39 --- (In reply to comment #203)
Seriously, there are better reasons for pulse to be supported than this.
Could you please state them?
I have no objection to pulseaudio being supported *correctly*.
Could you please define what means "correctly" to you, too?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.