http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
--- Comment #30 from jm@jm10.no-ip.com 2007-12-06 16:21:10 --- (In reply to comment #29) You're right: this piece of code exists in eMule 0.48a (emuleDlg.cpp). But if you look at comment #21, you'll that I did the tests with this version of eMule (0.48a).
In other words, since you suggest to close this bug, do you mean eMule can't do better ? That I will always have to keep a dialog box open ?
For me, wasting 15% of a P3 1GHz for nothing is not negligible, even if it's less than with previous versions.