http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22522
--- Comment #6 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-04-29 12:04:06 --- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Somehow I seem to remember that the version number was "the oldest known to exhibit the bug"
Yes, that is what the version field should reflect.
I don't agree. Retesting and comparing with the most recent version is much easier. Old versions tend to have various problems even when compiling, and it's hard to differentiate an already fixed bug with some other one. Only regressions need the oldest version for apparent reasons.
There have been numerous times you've asked reporters not to change the original reported wine version. Either way is fine with me, but please be consistent.