https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575
--- Comment #5 from Linards linards.liepins@gmail.com --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #4)
(In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #3)
(In reply to Austin English from comment #1)
http://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs has a warning not to file bugs for these sort of things, but as with other warnings, many users ignore.
In the case of Fedora, I think most users aren't even aware that they are using wine-staging. The package is named "wine," not "wine-staging," and looking at the console output posted yesterday in bug 30608, I don't see the warning about not reporting bugs here that used to be part of the build.
Apparently that only shows on the first launch of a process in a prefix; if another program was started and wineserver was running, launching a second process won't show that warning (or it was manually removed).
But yes, I agree; Fedora could and should make that distinction more visible to its users. E.g., their wiki doesn't mention staging, and directs users to WineHQ's bug tracker: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wine?rd=AndreasBierfert/Wine
Well, the starting point for you could be to do this ( from the wiki ):
"Updates-Testing
If you use the version of wine in the updates-testing repository then please log into bodhi and comment on the build, including any problems that may be in the packaging, naming, or elsewhere. The build needs positive karma to be pushed to the updates repository."
Also note, that page has not been update from more than a year.(In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #3)
(In reply to Linards from comment #2)
You mean this; You tested with a clean Wine directory (default location: "~/.wine", z: drive -> / link exists, no DLL overrides).'? Maybe someone update it with note that it also applies to non-patched Wine builds? '
You didn't read far enough; the page already addresses that:
"You haven't modified Wine in any way (i.e. you are using a prepackaged binary without any custom patches or modifications) or built from the official WineHQ source by doing: "./configure ; make depend ; make")"
Oh, my apologies, Mis. Yes, it is addressed. Thank you.