http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18672
--- Comment #12 from Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com 2010-01-01 18:18:27 --- (In reply to comment #11)
I'm not sure why it was rejected, last iteration had no comments. My guess was it was that nothing depended on it, so AJ didn't want to add the maintenance burden. But if an app needs it, perhaps he'd change his mind...
App doesn't need it to start. Registration info present in registry is enough to fix this crash. When I tried this a half of year ago I was in doubt to send a a patch to create registry entry cause I thought it's a crappy solution to add such class info without working implementation, I might be wrong of course. Probably AJ's opinion is what we need here.