http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15206
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #23 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2009-06-12 11:09:11 --- Looks better -- there are line numbers now! Here's a sample stack:
Backtrace: =>0 0x02e49c03 DebugUtil::BreakDebugger+0x3() [c:\users\dank\documents\chromium\src\base\debug_util_win.cc:103] in chrome (0x0033cd14) 1 0x01d280e8 SilentRuntimeAssertHandler+0x8(str=*** Invalid address 0x0033cd24 *** ) [c:\users\dank\documents\chromium\src\chrome\common\logging_chrome.cc:41] in chrome (0x0033cd1c) 2 0x02e1f1e6 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage+0x2f6() [c:\users\dank\documents\chromium\src\base\logging.cc:538] in chrome (0x0033ce88) 3 0x0341c22e ChildProcessHost::Iterator::Iterator+0x1ae(type=*** Invalid address 0x0033d058 *** ) [c:\users\dank\documents\chromium\src\chrome\common\child_process_host.cc:212] in chrome (0x0033d050) ...
Two problems remain: 1) those pesky "Invalid address" notes in the arguments 2) it still takes 20 minutes to handle one backtrace
but I guess those should be filed as separate bugs.