Why is everyone related to wine having such a negative attitude towards winepulse? One of the reasons why you said winepulse won't be included in wine is because no one will maintain it, but it looks like patches are released regulary.
In my opinion there should be done something about this nasty wine-pulseaaudio compatibility and I think a wine pulse audio driver is the way to go(because pulseaudio is everywere and the other sound servers aren't used in the main linux distributions), but that's just my oppinion.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, wine-bugs@winehq.org wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495
--- Comment #92 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-06-16 02:03:33 --- (In reply to comment #91)
Created an attachment (id=21805)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21805) [details]
winepulse [2 of 2]: Winmm driver for pulseaudio
Adding such an attachment is wrong and useless. Please keep this separate from this bug, since
- this will never be committed to WineHQ (the reasons are mentioned
numerous times in this bug) 2. bugzilla is not an appropriate storage place for not acceptable patches
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are a voter for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.