http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26630
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2011-04-03 17:40:18 CDT --- (In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
There is already one - INVALID, which translates to Not a Wine bug.
The idea I think is to have an UPSTREAM one to differenciate from invalid bugs that *are* actually invalid. Upstream bugs are still valid.
The product is 'Wine', only bugs for the product should be considered as valid IMHO. What's wrong with adding something like '(NVidia driver bug)', 'Linux kernel bug' in the subject when closing a bug as invalid when appropriate? This doesn't even deserve a keyword IMO.
The bugs are not valid wine bugs, but should be distinguished from truly invalid bugs. Yes, we could put it in the title, but that makes searching for them a bit harder.