http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40835
--- Comment #8 from Sagawa sagawa.aki+winebugs@gmail.com --- Unfortunately, no at this point.
pthread_mutexattr_setprotocol(3) is indeed implemented, which allows the part to compile successfully. However, since Wine 10.12[1], we've been using pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(3), although it's not implemented in NetBSD[2].
I was trying to report a bug related to setrobust(3), and I came across this bug report. I wonder if it might be clearer to handle setrobust(3) in a separate report.
[1] https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/commit/04e440fa120207a2675f8f10619bfaf... [2] https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=49269