https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25229
Robert Walker bob.mt.wya@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob.mt.wya@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Robert Walker bob.mt.wya@gmail.com --- (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #9)
The global admin queue has PM links for each test report submitted, but I don't know if maintainers have that in their queues.
The global admin queue??
I accidently rejected a test submission today - before I'd written a request for some additional information. Now I've got no easy way to contact the test submitter. I've tried quite hard to find one... Hence why I'm adding my $0.02 to this bug report...
IMO, the easiest way to deal with this would be for maintainers to delete rather than reject the report and ask the user to submit a new one with whatever changes the maintainer specifies.
That makes sense... But it's annoying for a user - if they've typed a lot of information. If all I need added - is say their graphics card/driver data - then they may not bother to re-post the submission.
Really this feels quite hostile to the kind of user base we have.
But how to fix it? I've a reasonable proposal...
Well I'd like to see a "limbo queue" for AppDB test submissions. This would be fully integrated with the existing one.
Entries in this limbo queue, of test submissions, would only be visible / accessible to: * AppDB maintainer (for the specific application) * the original submitter (WineHQ user)
Limbo entries would obviously not be included in any of the WineHQ statistics.
Then either party can do simple fixes - without the original test submission disappearing into "thin air".