https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17195
--- Comment #184 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #178)
ok first question: i assume that both patches have had some form of review and discussion? if so, where is that taking place so that the (increasingly large - 54 at the present time after 9 years) list of people interested in seeing this be fixed can get involved, make comments and so on?
As with all patches, that discussion is on wine-patches and wine-devel, not bugzilla.
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #183)
jacek, i hope that gives you some insight as to what you're up against. you're up not only against an extremely technically-challenging core strategic bottleneck where it's critical to get both high performance *and* characteristics (reliable datagrams) that *do not exist* in POSIX sockets (or they do but they're broken and highly non-portalbe), but you're also dealing with a leader whose attitude towards impartial (uncensored) criticism and constructive feedback that contradicts his "Rule Of Law" is met with what can only best be described as "spoiled brat childish behaviour".
Bugzilla is for bugs, not for spreading your views or criticisms of the Wine project. Take such things to your private blog or somewhere else.