http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717
--- Comment #24 from Krzysztof Nikiel zzdz2@yahoo.pl 2010-11-27 05:58:26 CST --- (In reply to comment #22) Do we really need more than 80dB ultrasound filtering, it will be masked by the souncard noise anyway, and masked even more by the amplifier noise. On the other side, i think it's possible a long impulse response may introduce some audible artifacts and it requires more CPU. Mixing speed may be important when mixing many buffers e.g. 3D buffers.
It would be possible to add some quality control. We could store the quality index in some reg key e.g. Software\Wine\DirectSound\ResampleQuality