[Bug 16622] possible bashism in config.guess

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16622

--- Comment #7 from Wolfram Sang   2010-03-20 03:07:17 ---
Okay then, what about this proposal?

I wait a few days for a response from upstream (maybe they have a reason to use
numbers? Not that I could see one, though). Then, this bug could be closed as
INVALID. If upstream picks it up, then I'll send a patch, also stating this is
fixed in the newest upstream-version, too (config doesn't have versions, just
timestamps), so AJ can decide what he will pick up. If upstream does not react,
I will just send the patch.