http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
Keith keith_kw_muir@blueyonder.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |keith_kw_muir@blueyonder.co. | |uk
--- Comment #17 from Keith keith_kw_muir@blueyonder.co.uk 2007-11-07 12:34:33 --- (In reply to comment #16)
I can confirm the "bug" with emule 0.9.38 patched for udp packets issue (see this: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5774) and without it.
Hardware used: PIII 500 @ 256 MB ram
With a *CLEAR* install with no file shared and no file hashing, the cpu load for emule.exe + wineserver is about 40%, and increase when files are downloaded.
I tried it with about 40-50 files, it's stable, but the cpuload reaches 80%. Perhaps there is to work on efficency of wine with emule... i suppose.
I'm hoping for this bug to get fixed soon but I don't understand why amule should have no problems but emule virtually the same program does.