https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39180
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #63 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #62)
(In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #61)
In general we try to work in one problem per bug avoiding what we call "meta bugs". That simplifies bug fixing by reducing the scope of the problem (divide and conquer).
I agree that it's better to have a separate bug for each focused issue, but it still helps to have a meta bug for that will encompass them all. It simply helps keeping track of things. Mozilla do it for Firefox for instance. I.e. open an encompassing general bug, and then open multiple individual bugs which affect it and mark the main one as dependent on the individual ones.
Do you think it's a sensible approach?
That is not Wine's policy. Of course Mozilla is entitled to their own.
The original crash has been fixed. New issues belong in separate reports.