http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
--- Comment #175 from Claudio sick_soul@yahoo.it 2010-06-21 13:44:56 --- (In reply to comment #174)
Well, hopefully this bug won't see 200-th comment. My apologies to everyone for this 1.5 years lag between proof-of-concept patch and in-tree fix :)
About test case - it is impossible to write 100% reliable test case for this bug; also test case isn't needed as the bug cause is obvious.
it might only get closer to 200 with the "thank you"s..
From an user perspective, which I have with wine, having an in-tree fix gives a
perception of improvement to the codebase, that makes me hope for wine's future as a technology.
Whenever a regression is present, even in something I do not use, it hurts.
So thank you (but I'll test :))