http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20296
--- Comment #40 from Amos Wenger amos@official.fm 2011-04-05 09:40:50 CDT --- (In reply to comment #39)
Sorry, that's even worse. The objection is that the patch is a kludge, whether or not it includes duplicated code.
I agree, I understand this patch will never be accepted as-is, just trying to gain a little momentum. Can anyone give directions for a cleaner approach? Christoph seems to suggest that a "surrogate server" (not sure what it is) is needed, but ends his comment with "So may not be needed on wine and the DLL can just be loaded in-process." so I'm not sure what he really meant.
There's good will here, I just need better feedback :/