http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11175
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank@kegel.com Severity|enhancement |normal Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |patch Target Milestone|--- |1.0.0
--- Comment #2 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-01-14 10:09:46 --- Perhaps the patch could be rewritten using an exception handler, a la http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2004-November/013791.html ? Aha, Alexandre suggested the same thing here: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-April/046560.html
Somebody tried to resubmit that patch in Feb 2007, but didn't follow that advice: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036060.html http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-February/054248.html
This is a longstanding issue with a patch and a clear suggestion from Alexandre, so nominating for 1.0.
BTW, it seems to me that telling people to get Adobe to fix their software is unhelpful because Adobe is unlikely to comply. If Adobe apps run on Windows, they ought to run on Wine.