https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39582
fjfrackiewicz@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fjfrackiewicz@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from fjfrackiewicz@gmail.com --- (In reply to winetest from comment #8)
Well this is interesting.
patching file dlls/bcrypt/bcrypt.spec Hunk #1 succeeded at 9 with fuzz 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 32 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 50 (offset 1 line). patching file dlls/bcrypt/bcrypt_main.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 27 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 57 with fuzz 2. Hunk #3 FAILED at 91. Hunk #4 FAILED at 184. Hunk #5 succeeded at 237 (offset 26 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 640 with fuzz 1 (offset -23 lines). 2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dlls/bcrypt/bcrypt_main.c.rej patching file dlls/bcrypt/tests/bcrypt.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 997 with fuzz 1 (offset 602 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 612. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dlls/bcrypt/tests/bcrypt.c.rej patching file include/bcrypt.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 70 with fuzz 2 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 76. Hunk #3 FAILED at 86. 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/bcrypt.h.rej
Patch needs rebase.
Part of that might have something to do with some of the bcrypt patches being moved from Wine Staging to Wine development.