http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27895
--- Comment #51 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2012-03-02 10:11:24 CST --- (In reply to comment #50)
Looks like a dupe indeed. When determining which one to close, 99% of the time it's the more recent one, since it came last (hence shouldn't have been created in the first place).
The only case I can think of right now where you close an earlier bug is if it's mostly abandoned/does not provide usefulinfo.
I know. But in this case, the other bug seems to have more useful information; the OR in that case is still testing and uploading logs, and they're for up-to-date versions of PA/ALSA. The OR in this bug hasn't been heard from in over half a year, and all of the logs posted here are from old PA/ALSA versions.
Perhaps what we should do is designate this bug as the one for the PA/ALSA bug that has been fixed upstream, and mark it invalid (but perhaps keep it open to catch duplicates), and use the other bug to track the problem with current PA/ALSA versions.