https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39411
--- Comment #1 from Hans Leidekker hans@meelstraat.net --- (In reply to François Gouget from comment #0)
But then one could argue that revert times should just be low and stay that way and that then monitoring them may not be needed.
I agree, and I believe reverts can be made fast. Currently reverting a VM means going back to a really old image and then applying a snapshot including large deltas, like service packs.
If we'd merge the snapshot into a new base image then the delta would be small, it would essentially be the VM saved state and applying it should be fast.