https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49113
--- Comment #6 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- I'd like to point out that the patches currently in wine-staging don't have much along the lines of traceability either; i.e. we don't know what real applications are improved by them or how bad they were in the first place. The comment recovered from the old wine-staging.com website helps, but it only gives a couple of numbers. The bug linked to the aforementioned staging patch (bug 43224) is aimed at an artificial benchmark.
(Incidentally, Dmitry, do you have access to the old Staging website, or had you saved those paragraphs locally at some point? I've been unable to find any content from the Staging website ever since it got taken down [and unable to find any content from the old bug tracker ever], and I'd really appreciate it if anyone does have access, or even a significant amount of content saved, essentially for these reasons.)
Rémi, that graph is detailed but kind of difficult to get an overall picture from. I was hoping for instead an absolute measurement of how long loading time is, with both heap managers. Adding Staging also might be good...