[Bug 39859] WineHQ packages for wine-gecko and wine-mono

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39859

--- Comment #8 from Nikolay Sivov  ---
(In reply to Austin English from comment #7)
> Mmm, good point. Perhaps have the gecko/mono package names match the
> 'branch' name, e.g., wine-gecko-stable, wine-gecko-devel, wine-gecko-staging
> (not ideal, I realize, but as long as they're in the same repo that may be
> the best option). wine-gecko-staging may not be needed, at least until y'all
> start patching gecko in addition to wine ;)

Package name could itself contain version, like wine-gecko1.2.3 and then main
package could depend/suggest it. They don't change that often to have various
flavors of it. Branch name seems a bit too much.