5 Oct
2018
5 Oct
'18
1:46 p.m.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45546
--- Comment #14 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to Anastasius Focht from comment #13)
--- quote --- Its also not clear why would GetThreadContext even be able to timeout with ACCESS_DENIED in the first place --- quote ---
You've got to be kidding... There are source code snippets provided in my comment.
I think Anton's point is it's not clear why the function should be *expected* possibly to never return; i.e. why was that contingency added in the first place?
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.