http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30849
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2012-06-07 12:14:05 CDT --- (In reply to comment #55)
Created attachment 40429 [details] address space limit tweak
(In reply to comment #52)
I'd expect it would also get 4Gb of address space on 64-bit Windows, so there must be something else going on here. Are you using a 32-bit or 64-bit wine prefix?
The attached is likely completely bogus, but it works and it might give you an idea about what's going on.
This would limit the address space even more than my first patch. The question is why does it require this, when the current behavior is AFAICT identical to that of 64-bit Windows.