http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18889
--- Comment #45 from Lucas canolucas@gmail.com 2010-08-16 18:22:22 --- the only draw-back that i can find is that you have to go through the 16 RESOURCE ID's untill you find the proper one, in a kind of proof-and-error way, instead of getting the proper one in the first and only try like the first patch seems to do (which i haven't tested at all but some comments say it works too). BUT, the patch by andreas is a lot of code in new functions, and it will need tests and maybe some optimization, where it is hard to optimize more the patch by andré H, as it is really nice and simple, and the time that it takes to go through those 16 loops seems to be almost the same than the time required to be done with all the functions and evaluations of the first patch.
in conclusion, both look good and seem to get the work done, the first one needs test cases, lets see what king AJ says :)