https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #3 from fiendishx@gmail.com --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #2)
WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
Huh. That feels like a bizarre decision.
I don't understand how it can be marked wontfix (after the fix patch was already created, no less) based on an assumption about the realness or distribution of the script in question rather than on the actual presence of a difference between behavior in Wine vs Windows. If I say that thousands of people have distribution of the software in question that includes the script does that change how real it is? I think that's the wrong benchmark. :\